Best online Nursing Writing Service agency

Investigation assessment 1

Topic Investigation assessment 1
PartB
by Myeong Ho Park
Submission date: 15-Apr-2020 11:15AM (UTC+1000)
Submission ID: 1297784238
File name: n8049394_Myeong_Ho_Park-Preliminary_Report.pdf (437.48K)
Word count: 5165
Character count: 30335

1
2
3
4
5
repetition
good

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project

Write My Essay For Me

Myeong Ho, I recognise that English is not your native language and I am not
marking you on your use of the English language; however, I am having real
difficulty understanding the concepts you are trying to communicate.
| | | | | unclear
| | | | | | |
7
8
9
Yes, but it would help to describe what you mean by anisotropic
characteristics.
10
11
12
This paragraph doesn’t make any sense.
Furthermore, it doesn’t relate in any way to the
cited paper. Actually, the Lacourt paper is a very
good paper. Please read it.
13
14
15
16
Ok
Are you saying
that nails and
screws are a
type of dowel
connection?
17
18
19
Yes, EWPs are
taking a greater
role in the
market, but I
don’t see how
this is relevant
to your topic.
20
I’m sorry, but
none of this
makes any
sense to me.
Myeong Ho, I am really struggling to understand what you
are trying to communicate here. Occasionally, something
will make sense, but most of what you have written is
impenetrable. Have you got an English speaking friend who
can help you express your thoughts more accurately?
Good, but Bedon et al focus on a log house, not a timber-framed
house.

21
Ok. You don’t need to worry about addressing a research gap.
That is something for Masters or PhD research. Your topic is
to model sheathing-to-timber connections and compare your
model to actual experimental data.
Not clear enough. You need to clearly articulate your aim. Then you
need to determine suitable objectives which, when fulfilled, will
ensure your aim is achieved.
I don’t
understand your
hypothesis.
This is a good scoping statement. But, again, what is displacement path dependence? I haven’t
got the slightest idea what you mean.
Your research question should be something like, “How accurate is a simple finite
element model of sheathing-to-timber connections compared to experimental
data?”
22
25
26
27
<— What is this?!!
Good!

28
29
FE
Modelling

You have a lot of very good references listed
here!
14%
SIMILARITY INDEX
9%
INTERNET SOURCES
11%
PUBLICATIONS
7%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 1%
2 1%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
8 1%
9
Topic Investigation assessment 1 PartB
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
www.nrcresearchpress.com
Internet Source
researchprofile.canterbury.ac.nz
Internet Source
zh.scientific.net
Internet Source
Submitted to Queensland University of
Technology
Student Paper
www.sci-en-tech.com
Internet Source
www.euro-online.org
Internet Source
Submitted to Anglia Ruskin University
Student Paper
Submitted to University College London
Student Paper
lnu.se
1%
10 1%
11 <1%
12 <1%
13 <1%
14 <1%
15 <1%
Internet Source
ascelibrary.org
Internet Source
carleton.ca
Internet Source
Y H Chui, Steven Craft. “Fastener head pullthrough resistance of plywood and oriented
strand board”, Canadian Journal of Civil
Engineering, 2002
Publication
Sheng-Cai Li, Ling-Kun Chen, Li-Zhong Jiang,
Jian-Qiu Li. “Experimental Investigation on the
Seismic Behavior of the Semi-Rigid One-Way
Straight Mortise-Tenon Joint of a Historical
Timber Building”, International Journal of
Architectural Heritage, 2019
Publication
Chenxiao Su, Haibei Xiong. “Experimental
Study on Tensile Bolted Connections of Crosslaminated Timber”, Structural Durability & Health
Monitoring, 2020
Publication
www.voyageurtackle.com
Internet Source
Mehran Zeynalian, Hamid R Ronagh,
16
<1%
17 <1%
18 <1%
19 <1%
20 <1%
21 <1%
22 <1%
23 <1%
Shahabeddin Hatami. “Structural performance
of riveted connections in cold-formed steel wall
stud”, Australian Journal of Structural
Engineering, 2018
Publication
Submitted to College of Estate Management
Student Paper
Zhi Li, Tao Li, Can Wang, Xiaozhou He, Yan
Xiao. “Experimental study of an unsymmetrical
prefabricated hybrid steel-bamboo roof truss”,
Engineering Structures, 2019
Publication
open.lnu.se
Internet Source
Submitted to University of Sheffield
Student Paper
Manuel Santarsiero, Chiara Bedon, Kosmas
Moupagitsoglou. “Energy-based considerations
for the seismic design of ductile and dissipative
glass frames”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, 2019
Publication
Submitted to Australian National University
Student Paper
Submitted to Christchurch Polytechnic Institute
of Technology
24 <1%
25 <1%
26 <1%
27 <1%
28 <1%
29 <1%
30
Student Paper
A. Hassanieh, H. Valipour. “Experimental and
numerical study of OSB sheathed-LVL stud wall
with stapled connections”, Construction and
Building Materials, 2020
Publication
www.woodresearch.sk
Internet Source
Jixing Cao, Haibei Xiong, Jiawei Chen,
Alexandre Huynh. “Bayesian parameter
identification for empirical model of CLT
connections”, Construction and Building
Materials, 2019
Publication
Submitted to Coventry University
Student Paper
Jing He, Fang Pan, C.S. Cai, Arindam
Chowdhury, Filmon Habte. “Progressive failure
analysis of low-rise timber buildings under
extreme wind events using a DAD approach”,
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, 2018
Publication
Submitted to University of Western Sydney
Student Paper
Mohammad Mehdi Ebadi, Ghasan Doudak, Ian
<1%
31 <1%
32 <1%
33 <1%
34 <1%
35 <1%
Smith. “Finite-Element Modeling and Parametric
Study of Glulam Beam-and-Deck Floors”,
Journal of Structural Engineering, 2017
Publication
Martina Sciomenta, Chiara Bedon, Massimo
Fragiacomo, Angelo Luongo. “Shear
Performance Assessment of Timber Log-House
Walls under In-Plane Lateral Loads via
Numerical and Analytical Modelling”, Buildings,
2018
Publication
Zhi Li, Jinyuan Zhang, Rui Wang, Giorgio Monti,
Yan Xiao. “Design Embedment Strength of
Plybamboo Panels Used for GluBam”, Journal
of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2020
Publication
Submitted to University of Technology, Sydney
Student Paper
Johannes Hummel, Werner Seim.
“Displacement-based design approach to
evaluate the behaviour factor for multi-storey
CLT buildings”, Engineering Structures, 2019
Publication
Dimitrios Vamvatsikos, C. Allin Cornell.
“Incremental dynamic analysis”, Earthquake
Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2002
Publication
36 <1%

Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography Off

Exclude matches Off
Natalino Gattesco, Ingrid Boem. “Numerical
study on the reduction of the seismic
vulnerability of historical industrial buildings with
wide timber roofs”, Procedia Structural Integrity,
2018
Publication
FINAL GRADE
9/20
Topic Investigation assessment 1 PartB
GRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
Comment 1
I’m not sure what you mean here.
Comment 2
Very Good
Comment 3
Meaning what??
Comment 4
These are European specifications. You should focus your numerical modelling on Australian timber
specifications.
Comment 5
??
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. repetition
Text Comment. good
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
Text Comment. Myeong Ho, I recognise that English is not your native language and I am not
marking you on your use of the English language; however, I am having real difficulty understanding
the concepts you are trying to communicate.
Text Comment. | | | | | unclear | | | | | | |
Comment 7
Do you mean moment resisting frames or vertical trusses?
PAGE 5
Comment 8
What do you mean by this?
Comment 9
Ebadi et al (2019) don’t mention dowel-type connections. They modelled each screw as three
orthogonal springs with rigid links to ensure a limit to the movement of the springs.
Text Comment. Yes, but it would help to describe what you mean by anisotropic
characteristics.
Comment 10
I don’t understand what you are saying here.
Comment 11
What you wrote has nothing to do with this paper!
Comment 12
??
PAGE 6
Text Comment. This paragraph doesn’t make any sense. Furthermore, it doesn’t relate in any
way to the cited paper. Actually, the Lacourt paper is a very good paper. Please read it.
Comment 13
I’m guessing that you are describing your plan to conduct numerical modelling and compare it to
actual test data.
Comment 14
??
PAGE 7
Comment 15
What does this have to do with Zeynalian? Zeynalian’s work is focused on cold formed steel framing.
Comment 16
Is this nails, screws and bolts? Or are you referring to traditional joints without connectors? I’m just
not sure what you are saying.
Text Comment. Ok
PAGE 8
Text Comment. Are you saying that nails and screws are a type of dowel connection?
Comment 17
??
Comment 18
I still have no idea what you mean by this phrase!!
Comment 19
This is a false statement. There has been a huge amount of work on many different types of
connections in timber.
Text Comment. Yes, EWPs are taking a greater role in the market, but I don’t see how this is
relevant to your topic.
Comment 20
This does not logically follow.
PAGE 9
Text Comment. I’m sorry, but none of this makes any sense to me.
PAGE 10
Text Comment. Myeong Ho, I am really struggling to understand what you are trying to
communicate here. Occasionally, something will make sense, but most of what you have written is
impenetrable. Have you got an English speaking friend who can help you express your thoughts
more accurately?
PAGE 11
Text Comment. Good, but Bedon et al focus on a log house, not a timber-framed house.
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
Comment 21
No, you haven’t established this. I still have no idea what you mean by displacement path
dependency.
Text Comment. Ok. You don’t need to worry about addressing a research gap. That is
something for Masters or PhD research. Your topic is to model sheathing-to-timber connections and
compare your model to actual experimental data.
PAGE 14
Text Comment. Not clear enough. You need to clearly articulate your aim. Then you need to
determine suitable objectives which, when fulfilled, will ensure your aim is achieved.
Text Comment. I don’t understand your hypothesis.
Text Comment. This is a good scoping statement. But, again, what is displacement path
dependence? I haven’t got the slightest idea what you mean.
PAGE 15
Text Comment. Your research question should be something like, “How accurate is a simple
finite element model of sheathing-to-timber connections compared to experimental data?”
Comment 22
Too ambitious. You won’t have enough time to evaluate multiple models. I’ll be pleased if you
evaluate just one model.
Strikethrough.
Strikethrough.
Comment 25
In this section, you didn’t outline any objectives, you didn’t describe your methodology and you
haven’t produced a research plan.
Comment 26
This is not relevant to your project. Your data collection will be a result of running the Finite Element
Software to determine how accurate your model is compared to experimental data.
PAGE 16
Comment 27
What on earth does this have to do with your project?
Text Comment. <— What is this?!!
PAGE 17
Text Comment. Good!
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
Comment 28
No it won’t. You don’t need any money to do this project.
Comment 29
What?! You don’t need to do any field work. Besides, I have already done the experimental work,
so you can use the data for free.
Strikethrough.
PAGE 20
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. FE Modelling
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
Text Comment. You have a lot of very good references listed here!
RUBRIC: ASSESSMENT 1B:PROJECT PROPOSAL
PRESENATION (10%)
7+ FULL MARKS
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92.50)
DISTINCTION
(80)
CREDIT
(70)
PASS
(57.50)
MARGINAL FAIL
(45)
FAIL
(32.50)
NE
(0)
LIT REVIEW (20%)
7+ FULL MARKS
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92.50)
DISTINCTION
(80)
CREDIT
(70)
PASS
(57.50)
MARGINAL FAIL
(45)
FAIL
(32.50)
43.75 / 100
32.50 / 100
Layout and writing quality
Exceptional, Very neat and concise presentation, no language mistakes. Easy to read
(simple sentences),
Exceptional, Very neat and concise presentation, no language mistakes. Easy to read
(simple sentences),
Excellent. Neat and concise presentation, minor (occasional) language mistakes. Mostly
easy to read. Flows easily, Logical sub sections.
Good. Overall presentation looks good, but on closer inspection reveals some mistakes in
language. Some elaboration of trivial points to pad up the report.
Satisfactory. Overall presentation looks good, but on closer inspection reveals several
mistakes in language. Unnecessary elaboration of trivial points.
General presentation is poor. Writing may be difficult to understand with gaps in logic,
jargon over explanation etc.
General presentation is poor. Writing may be difficult to understand with gaps in logic,
jargon over explanation etc.
No evidence
32.50 / 100
What the student has learnt about the topic area
A comprehensive initial literature review relevant to defining the project scope, which
demonstrates a good understanding of related background work.
A comprehensive initial literature review relevant to defining the project scope, which
demonstrates a good understanding of related background work.
An extensive initial literature review relevant to defining the project scope, which
demonstrates a good understanding of the background to the project.
An initial literature review relevant to defining the project scope, which demonstrates a
good understanding of the background to the project.
An initial literature review relevant to defining the project scope, which demonstrates an
adequate understanding of the background to the project.
An initial literature review which does not demonstrates an adequate understanding of the
background to the project.
An initial literature review which does not demonstrates an adequate understanding of the
background to the project.
NE
(0)
DEFINTION (30%)
7+ FULL MARKS
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92.50)
DISTINCTION
(80)
CREDIT
(70)
PASS
(57.50)
MARGINAL FAIL
(45)
FAIL
(32.50)
NE
(0)
PLAN (30%)
7+ FULL MARKS
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92.50)
DISTINCTION
(80)
CREDIT
(70)
PASS
(57.50)
MARGINAL FAIL
(45)
FAIL
No evidence
32.50 / 100
Project Definition, what the student intents to do
A very well-defined project proposal which demonstrates a clear and detailed
understanding of what the project entails.
A very well-defined project proposal which demonstrates a clear and detailed
understanding of what the project entails.
A well-defined project proposal which demonstrates a detailed understanding of what the
project entails.
A well-defined project proposal which demonstrates an understanding of what the project
entails.
A project proposal which demonstrates adequate understanding of what the project
entails.
Little evidence of understanding of what the project entails.
Little evidence of understanding of what the project entails.
No evidence
57.50 / 100
Project Plan, how the student intends to complete the project
A comprehensive breakdown of all the elements within the project, which demonstrates a
sound methodology for completing the project.
A comprehensive breakdown of all the elements within the project, which demonstrates a
sound methodology for completing the project.
An extensive breakdown of all the elements within the project, which demonstrates a
sound methodology for completing the project.
A breakdown of elements within the project, which demonstrates a sound methodology for
completing the project.
An adequate breakdown of the elements within the project Demonstration of methodology
for completing the project is reasonable.
An inadequate breakdown of the elements within the project. No clear demonstration of
methodology for completing the project.
An inadequate breakdown of the elements within the project. No clear demonstration of
(32.50)
NE
(0)
GANTT CHART (10%)
7+ FULL MARKS
(100)
HIGH DISTINCTION
(92.50)
DISTINCTION
(80)
CREDIT
(70)
PASS
(57.50)
MARGINAL FAIL
(45)
FAIL
(32.50)
NE
(0)
methodology for completing the project.
No evidence
70 / 100
A comprehensive and detailed time plan of when each element within the project can be
completed.
A comprehensive and detailed time plan of when each element within the project can be
completed.
An extensive and detailed time plan of when each element within the project can be
completed.
A detailed time plan of when each element within the project can be completed.
An adequate time plan of when each element within the project can be completed
An insufficient time plan.
An insufficient time plan.
No evidence

[Button id=”1″]

If you are seeking for fast and reliable essay help, you got on the right page. You can order essays, discussion, article critique, coursework, projects, case study, term papers, research papers, reaction paper, movie review, research proposal, capstone project, speech/presentation, book report/review, annotated bibliography, and more. From now on, you can stop worry and forget about writing assignments: your college papers are safe with our expert writers

STUCK with your assignments? Hire Someone to Write Your papers. 100% plagiarism-free work Guarantee!

PLACE YOUR ORDER