Program Logic – Assessment 2 support document
A Program Logic is a tabular display (roadmap) of the relationship between your program’s
activities and its intended effects. It generally follows a logical sequence of ’if-then’
relationships as follows: Inputs ->activities ->outputs ->short-term outcomes ->intermediate
outcomes ->long-term outcomes
For most parts of the program logic (mainly the outputs and outcomes), there are a set of
indicators. Indicators are a marker of accomplishment/progress. It is a specific, observable, and
measurable accomplishment or change that shows the progress made toward achieving a
specific output or outcome in your program logic.
For this assessment, you are completing a section of the program logic (outputs and indicators).
There is some variation in the way you can write an indicator. Critical thought, analysis and
writing concisely is crucial for this assessment. Please see the example table below.
References – there is not a specific number of references mandated for this assessment. It is
always good to support your claims with evidence where available, especially sources for
making benchmark or expected change, etc..
Using the case study below or your own health issue with goal and objective, your task is to
develop three outputs and one indicator for each output, considering the means of verification
and assumptions for your indicators through completing the table below.
Goal: | |||
Objective: | |||
Output | Indicators (Measure to verify to what extent the goal is fulfilled – include targets and baseline data where possible) |
Means of verification (data sources of information for measuring performance – what research methods will be used, frequency of dta collection e.g. every six months, annually) |
Assumptions (critical evaluation of the potential barriers/ facilitators of the specific program output) |
Output 1: | |||
Output 2: | |||
Output 3: |
CASE STUDY: To reduce the number of vaccine-preventable deaths in NSW, the state
government has invested funds towards increasing the state’s immunisation rate to 98%, with
Program Logic – Assessment 2 support document
targeted programs in the Northern Eastern suburbs of Sydney that have the lowest rate of fullimmunised five-year-olds (below 90%).
Goal: Reduce the number of vaccine-preventable deaths in NSW
WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project
Write My Essay For MeObjective: 2025 |
Increase the rate of fully vaccinated children five-years and under to 98% in NSW by |
EXAMPLE
Goal: | Improve the health outcomes Campbelltown population | ||
Objective: | Reduce prevalence of daily smokers by 10% by 2022 in Campbelltown | ||
Output | Indicators (Measure to verify to what extent the goal is fulfilled – include targets and baseline data where possible) |
Means of verification (data sources of information for measuring performance – what research methods will be used, frequency of data collection e.g. every six months, annually) |
Assumptions (critical evaluation of the potential barriers/ facilitators of the specific program output) |
Output 1: Smoke-free workplace policies are implemented throughout Campbelltown |
Increase proportion of workplaces in Campbelltown with smoke-free policies from 60% to 95% by 2025 Proportion of workplaces in Campbelltown that have implemented smoke-free policy Baseline: 60% in 2020 Target: 95% by 2025 |
Meetings with key personnel of workplaces that do not have smoke-free policies, every two months for 12 months, to gauge perception of smoke-free policy and actual implementation |
Organisational attitudes could be negative to smoke free workplace policy, nicotine addiction |
Output 2: | |||
Output 3: |
Program Logic – Assessment 2 support document
Goal/purpose: What the program will contribute to in the long-term. Strategic and high-level.
Objectives: Anticipated main results of the program. More precise and verifiable – what, who,
where, by how much, by when. Target group specified. Contributes to the goal.
Inputs are the resources that go into the program. This is what we invest, and may include staff,
volunteers, time, money, research base, materials, equipment, technology, and partners.
Outputs reflect the activities the program undertakes. This includes what we do as well as who we
reach in the process of implementing activities. Results that can be guaranteed by the
program/project. Tangible, specific and direct products of program activities. Necessary to achieve
the objective. Precisely and verifiably defined – quantity, quality, location, time. Target oriented.
Realistic in terms of time, resources, capacity.
Outcomes are the changes or benefits that result, and can be categorized according to short-term,
medium-term, and long-term time frames.
Assumptions are the potential barriers/ facilitators of the specific program output. It is
important to consider these assumptions, as it can determine the success of your program. For
example, when training health staff in a new protocol you must consider clinician time and
motivation to engage. Other considerations could include environmental conditions e.g. a region
prone to flooding, or other natural disasters, civil conflict, or socio-cultural/religious customs and
traditions that may inhibit certain activities.
Program Logic – Assessment 2 support document
Source: https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/resources/guids/results_chain/logic_models
Program Logic – Assessment 2 support document
Program Logic – Assessment 2 support document
[Button id=”1″]
If you are seeking for fast and reliable essay help, you got on the right page. You can order essays, discussion, article critique, coursework, projects, case study, term papers, research papers, reaction paper, movie review, research proposal, capstone project, speech/presentation, book report/review, annotated bibliography, and more. From now on, you can stop worry and forget about writing assignments: your college papers are safe with our expert writers