Penetration testing | Computer Science homework help

Points: 120

Term Paper: Penetration Testing

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain the tests you would run and the reason(s) for running them (e.g. to support the risk assessment plan).

Weight 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the tests you would run and the reason(s) for running them (e.g. to support the risk assessment plan).

Insufficiently explained the tests you would run and the reason(s) for running them (e.g. to support the risk assessment plan).

Partially explained the tests you would run and the reason(s) for running them (e.g. to support the risk assessment plan).

Satisfactorily explained the tests you would run and the reason(s) for running them (e.g. to support the risk assessment plan).

Thoroughly explained the tests you would run and the reason(s) for running them (e.g. to support the risk assessment plan).

2. Determine the expected results from tests and research based on the specific informational details provided.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the expected results from tests and research based on the specific informational details provided.

Insufficiently determined the expected results from tests and research based on the specific informational details provided.

Partially determined the expected results from tests and research based on the specific informational details provided.

Satisfactorily determined the expected results from tests and research based on the specific informational details provided.

Thoroughly determined the expected results from tests and research based on the specific informational details provided.

3. Analyze the software tools you would use for your investigation and reasons for choosing them.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the software tools you would use for your investigation and reasons for choosing them.

Insufficiently analyzed the software tools you would use for your investigation and reasons for choosing them.

Partially analyzed the software tools you would use for your investigation and reasons for choosing them.

Satisfactorily analyzed the software tools you would use for your investigation and reasons for choosing them.

Thoroughly analyzed the software tools you would use for your investigation and reasons for choosing them.

4. Describe the legal requirements and ethical issues involved.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described the legal requirements; did not submit or incompletely described ethical issues involved.

Insufficiently described the legal requirements; insufficiently described ethical issues involved.

Partially described the legal requirements; partially described ethical issues involved.

Satisfactorily described the legal requirements; satisfactorily described ethical issues involved.

Thoroughly described the legal requirements; thoroughly described ethical issues involved.

5. Using Visio or its open source alternative, provide a diagram of how you would redesign this business’ network. Include a description of your drawing.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a diagram of how you would redesign this business’ network using Visio or its open source alternative. Did not submit or incompletely included a description of your drawing.

Insufficiently provided a diagram of how you would redesign this business’ network using Visio or its open source alternative. Insufficiently included a description of your drawing.

Partially provided a diagram of how you would redesign this business’ network using Visio or its open source alternative. Partially included a description of your drawing.

Satisfactorily provided a diagram of how you would redesign this business’ network using Visio or its open source alternative. Satisfactorily included a description of your drawing.

Thoroughly provided a diagram of how you would redesign this business’ network using Visio or its open source alternative. Thoroughly included a description of your drawing.

6. Propose your final recommendations and reporting.  Explain what risks exist and ways to either eliminate or reduce the risk.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely proposed your final recommendations and reporting.  Did not submit or incompletely explained what risks exist and ways to either eliminate or reduce the risk.

Insufficiently proposed your final recommendations and reporting.  Insufficiently explained what risks exist and ways to either eliminate or reduce the risk.

Partially proposed your final recommendations and reporting.  Partially explained what risks exist and ways to either eliminate or reduce the risk.

Satisfactorily proposed your final recommendations and reporting.  Satisfactorily explained what risks exist and ways to either eliminate or reduce the risk.

Thoroughly proposed your final recommendations and reporting.  Thoroughly explained what risks exist and ways to either eliminate or reduce the risk.

7. 3 references 

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present 

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present